Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Arq. ciências saúde UNIPAR ; 27(1): 511-530, Jan-Abr. 2023.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1417859

ABSTRACT

No fim de 2019 iniciou-se uma das maiores crises da saúde pública global em Wuhan, China. Essa emergência foi o aparecimento do SARS-CoV-2 e da doença COVID-19, uma síndrome respiratória aguda de alta transmissibilidade. A declaração da pandemia pela OMS em março de 2020 fez com que o mundo tomasse diversas medidas para o combate e contenção da doença. Inicialmente o isolamento social e lockdown foram as principais iniciativas, já que não havia formas de tratamento ou prevenção da doença. Essas medidas restritivas geraram uma mudança de hábito da população que deflagrou sérios comprometimentos físicos e psicológicos. Uma das consequências foi o aumento do uso de substâncias de abuso e, consequentemente, do transtornos por uso de substâncias, dentre elas o tabaco. Durante a pandemia o consumo de cigarro aumentou de 10 a 30% no mundo, o tabagismo é a principal causa de morte evitável e fator de risco para diversas doenças. Conjuntamente ao álcool, a nicotina têm um poder aditivo superior a muitas drogas ilícitas. A combinação dos transtornos por uso de substâncias e a COVID-19 acabam por ter um efeito sinérgico, dessa forma, buscamos integrar aspectos neuroquímicos, cognitivos e comportamentais que levaram ao aumento do consumo e/ou recaída nicotina e a terapêutica utilizada.


One of the biggest global public health crisis began in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019. That emergency was the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the disease COVID-19, a highly transmissible acute respiratory syndrome. The pandemic declaration by the WHO in March 2020 caused the world to take on several measures to combat and contain the virus. Initially, social isolation and lockdown were the main initiatives, as there were no forms of treatment or prevention of the disease. These restrictive measures generate a change in the habit of the population that triggered serious physical and psychological impairments. One of the consequences was the increase in the use of substances of abuse and, consequently, substance use disorder, including tobacco. During the pandemic, cigarette consumption increased from 10 to 30% worldwide, whereas smoking is the main cause of preventable death and a risk factor for several diseases. Along with alcohol, nicotine has a greater addictive power than illicit drugs. Substance use disorders and COVID-19 have a synergistic effect, in this way, we seek to integrate neurochemical, cognitive and behavioral aspects that led to increased consumption and/or relapse in nicotine consumption and the used therapy.


Una de las mayores crisis mundiales de salud pública comenzó en Wuhan (China) a finales de 2019. Esa emergencia fue la aparición del SARS-CoV-2 y la enfermedad COVID-19, un síndrome respiratorio agudo altamente transmisible. La declaración de pandemia por parte de la OMS en marzo de 2020 hizo que el mundo adoptara varias medidas para combatir y contener el virus. Inicialmente, el aislamiento social y el encierro fueron las principales iniciativas, ya que no existían formas de tratamiento o prevención de la enfermedad. Estas medidas restrictivas generaron un cambio en los hábitos de la población que desencadenó graves alteraciones físicas y psicológicas. Una de las consecuencias fue el aumento del consumo de sustancias de abuso y, en consecuencia, el trastorno por consumo de sustancias, incluido el tabaco. Durante la pandemia, el consumo de cigarrillos aumentó del 10 al 30% en todo el mundo, mientras que el tabaquismo es la principal causa de muerte evitable y un factor de riesgo de varias enfermedades. Junto con el alcohol, la nicotina tiene un mayor poder adictivo que las drogas ilícitas. Los trastornos por uso de sustancias y la COVID-19 tienen un efecto sinérgico, de esta manera, buscamos integrar los aspectos neuroquímicos, cognitivos y conductuales que llevaron al aumento del consumo y/o recaída en el consumo de nicotina y la terapia utilizada.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Pandemics/history , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anxiety , Recurrence , Epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Varenicline/therapeutic use , Psychological Distress
3.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 145(11): 1471-1479, nov. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BIGG | ID: biblio-902468

ABSTRACT

Considering that a high proportion of the Chilean general population smokes, the Chilean Society of Respiratory Diseases in collaboration with the Chilean Societies of Cardiology and, Endocrinology and Diabetes, formed an interdisciplinary group, who issued a set of recommendations for the treatment of the smoker, methodologically advised by experts. These interventions should be prioritized in high-risk groups. Methods The panel elaborated and graded the recommendations following the GRADE methodology. To assess the effect of each intervention, systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials were identified. In addition, a search of studies done with the Chilean population was carried out. For each of the questions, the panel determined the direction and strength of the recommendation through a decision evidence table. Recommendations For all smokers, the panel recommends using brief counseling ABC on non-intervention, using mobile telephone interventions on non-intervention, using text message on non-intervention, (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). For motivated individuals, with indication for quitting drugs the panel recommends using nicotine replacement therapy on non-intervention, using bupropion on non-intervention, using varenicline on non-intervention. (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). Discussion This clinical practice guide provides recommendations based on the evidence for smoking cessation.


El propósito de esta guía es presentar recomendaciones basadas en evidencia sobre las intervenciones disponibles para dejar de fumar. Su audiencia objetivo corresponde a todos los profesionales de la salud y su población objetivo corresponde a personas fumadoras atendidas en ambientes ambulatorios u hospitalarios, además de poblaciones especiales como embarazadas, adolescentes y pacientes con enfermedad psiquiátrica (compensada por al menos tres meses).


Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Chile , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Varenicline/therapeutic use , GRADE Approach
4.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 33(3): 167-175, set. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-899671

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Considerando que la población chilena tiene una historia de alto consumo de tabaco la Sociedad Chilena de Enfermedades Respiratorias en colaboración con las Sociedades Chilenas de Cardiología; Endocrinología y Diabetes formó un grupo interdisciplinario que emitió un conjunto de recomendaciones para el enfrentamiento del paciente fumador, asesorado metodológicamente por expertos. Estas intervenciones deben priorizarse en grupos de alto riesgo. Métodos: El panel elaboró y graduó las recomendaciones siguiendo la metodología GRADE. Para estimar el efecto de cada intervención, se identificó revisiones sistemáticas y estudios clínicos aleatorizados. Además, se realizó una búsqueda de estudios realizados con población chilena. Para cada una de las preguntas, el panel determinó la dirección y fuerza de la recomendación mediante una tabla de la Evidencia a la Decisión. Recomendaciones: Para todos los fumadores, el panel recomienda usar consejería breve sobre no intervención, consejería vía telefonía móvil sobre no intervención, y mensajes de texto sobre no intervención (recomendación fuerte; certeza moderada en la evidencia de los efectos). Para los individuos motivados, con indicación de fármacos para dejar de fumar el panel recomienda terapia de reemplazo de nicotina sobre no intervención, bupropión sobre no intervención, vareniclina sobre no intervención (recomendación fuerte; certeza moderada en la evidencia de los efectos). Discusión: Se emiten recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para el tratamiento del tabaquismo.


Considering that Chilean population has a high tobacco consumption history, the Chilean Society of Respiratory Diseases in collaboration with the Chilean Societies of Cardiology and, Endocrinology and Diabetes, formed an interdisciplinary group, who issued a set of recommendations for the treatment of the smoker, methodologically advised by experts. These interventions should be prioritized in high-risk groups. Methods: The panel elaborated and graded the recommendations following the GRADE methodology. To assess the effect of each intervention, systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials were identified. In addition, a search of studies done with the Chilean population was carried out. For each of the questions, the panel determined the direction and strength of the recommendation through a decision evidence table. Recommendations: For all smokers, the panel recommends using brief counseling ABC on non-intervention, using mobile telephone interventions on non-intervention, using text message on non-intervention, (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). For motivated individuals, with indication for quitting drugs the panel recommends using nicotine replacement therapy on non-intervention, using bupropion on non-intervention, using varenicline on non-intervention. (strong recommendation; moderate certainty in the evidence of the effects). Discussion: This clinical practice guide provides recommendations based on the evidence for smoking cessation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Smoking Cessation , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Varenicline/therapeutic use , Nicotine/therapeutic use
5.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 33(3): 212-215, set. 2017.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-899682

ABSTRACT

Resumen Vareniclina es terapia de primera línea para la cesación del tabaquismo, y presenta la mayor efectividad demostrada ampliamente en ensayos clínicos logrando cifras de abandono al año del orden de 25-35%. En la más reciente revisión de efectividad realizada por la Cochrane se evaluaron 39 ensayos que randomizaban vareniclina contra placebo y en comparación con sustitutos de nicotina (TRN) y bupropión. Con vareniclina se objetivó un RR de 2,24 para abstinencia a 6 meses o más prolongado a dosis standard (2 mg al día) contra placebo. El RR de vareniclina versus placebo comparando con bupropión o TRN fue de 1,3 y 1,25 respectivamente mostrando su superioridad una vez más. Cuando se evaluó el uso de vareniclina por un periodo más prolongado que 12 semanas, se observó que la droga fue bien tolerada sugiriendo que es factible su uso sin intensificar los efectos adversos.


Varenicline is a first-line therapy cessation of smoking, and has the highest effectiveness widely demonstrated in clinical trials with drop-out figures per year of the order of 25-35%. In the most recent effectiveness review conducted by the Cochrane, 39 trials were evaluated that randomized varenicline versus placebo and compared with nicotine substitutes (NRT) and bupropion. With varenicline, a RR of 2.24 was observed for abstinence at 6 months or longer at standard doses (2 mg daily) versus placebo. The RR of varenicline versus placebo compared with bupropion or NRT was 1.3 and 1.25 respectively showing its superiority once again. When the use of varenicline was evaluated for a period longer than 12 weeks, it was observed that the drug was well tolerated suggesting that its use is feasible without intensifying the adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Varenicline/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Nicotinic Antagonists , Nicotine
6.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 144(8): 965-971, ago. 2016. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-830600

ABSTRACT

Background: Smoking cessation therapies include counseling, psychological management and pharmacological therapy. Varenicline is the most effective and safe medication available. Aim: To study risk factors for the failure of pharmacological smoking cessation therapy with varenicline. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 281 patients aged 45 ± 11 years (65% males) with a mean consumption of 31 ± 22 packs/year. They completed a smoking cessation program comprising psychological support and use of varenicline in a private clinic. Patients were followed with telephonic interviews during one year. A complete abstinence during one year was considered as a success of the program. Results: The success rate of the program was 53.4%. The factors associated with failure were a high tobacco dependence rate determined with the Fageström test (Odds ratio (OR) 2.47, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.16-5.26, p = 0.02). An instruction level of more than 12 years was associated with a lower failure rate (OR 0.38 95% CI 0.18-0.82). Conclusions: A high tobacco dependence rate and a lower education were associated with a higher failure rate of this smoking cessation program.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Program Evaluation , Smoking/drug therapy , Smoking Cessation/methods , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Varenicline/therapeutic use , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/psychology , Epidemiologic Methods , Treatment Outcome , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Age of Onset , Educational Status , National Health Programs/standards
7.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 31(2): 94-100, jun. 2015. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-757183

ABSTRACT

Background: Tobacco use is one of the main preventable causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. This report presents the experience of the smoking cessation team from the National Thorax Institute (Instituto Nacional del Tórax-Chile). Patients and Method: A clinical series of patients treated between April 2013 and March 2014, with one-year follow-up was studied. Intervention was based on seven group sessions, with a cognitive behavioral viewpoint and pharmacological treatment (mainly varenicline). Follow-up was done through telephone calls at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Descriptive statistics and X² test were used. Results: Eighty-seven patients were treated, mean age 54 years, 63% women; 79% had a pack year index over 20; 28% had depression and 16% had COPD. 59% received varenicline. Self-reported abstinence for 12 months was 37%. No significant differences between high risk groups were found. Conclusion: The smoking cessation program done at the National Thorax Institute shows that it is feasible to implement this type of programs in the public health system of Chile with results comparable to those internationally published.


Introducción: El tabaco es uno de los principales factores de morbimortalidad prevenible en el mundo. En este artículo se presenta la experiencia del equipo de tratamiento del tabaquismo en el Instituto Nacional del Tórax (INT). Método: Se analizaron los pacientes tratados entre abril de 2013 y marzo de 2014, con seguimiento a un año. La intervención consistió en 7 sesiones grupales con enfoque cognitivo conductual y terapia farmacológica (principalmente vareniclina). El seguimiento fue telefónico al mes 1, 3, 6 y 12. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva y test de X². Resultados: Se sometieron a tratamiento 87pacientes, edad promedio 54 años, 63% mujeres; tienen índice paquete año sobre 20 el 79%, depresión 28% y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica 16%. El 59% recibió vareniclina. La abstinencia autoreportada a 12 meses fue de 37%. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en grupos de riesgo. Conclusión: La experiencia de tratamiento anti-tabaco realizada en el INT muestra que es factible implementar este tipo de programas en el sistema público de salud chileno con resultados comparables a las publicaciones internacionales.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Chile , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Varenicline/therapeutic use
8.
Rev. salud pública ; 16(5): 661-673, set.-oct. 2014. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-743928

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Revisar la eficacia y seguridad de medicamentos para cesación del tabaquismo en el contexto de construcción de guías de práctica clínica (GPC). Métodos Revisión sistemática de GPC para adaptación mediante ADAPTE. Los desenlaces fueron cesación ≥6 meses y seguridad de las intervenciones. Las GPC se calificaron por pares con DELBI. Se extrajeron resultados de estudios agregativos incluidos en las guías seleccionadas. Resultados Los fármacos duplican la cesación comparados con placebo (tasas de 25,0 % hasta 27,0 % al combinarse con consejería). Los mayores incrementos en cesación se obtienen con ansiolíticos y antidepresivos (8,7% a 19,4%), y los menores con terapia de reemplazo nicotínico -TRN- (5,2% a 12,9%). La nortriptilina tiene eficacia similar al bupropion (aproximadamente 10,0 %). Con limitadas excepciones (parche e inhalador, tabletas y bupropion), las combinaciones de medicamentos no incrementan la abstinencia. Conclusiones TRN, vareniclina, bupropion y nortriptilina son eficaces para dejar de fumar. Las combinaciones de medicamentos requieren más evidencia y deberían restringirse a personas con alta dependencia o con falla terapéutica inicial. Serían deseables análisis de costo-efectividad para valorar implementación de programas en países en desarrollo.


Objective To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods A systematic review of CPGs was conducted, aimed at adapting recommendations for Colombia following the ADAPTE methodology. Outcomes comprised 6-months or higher smoking cessation rates and intervention safety. CPGs were peer-assessed based on DELBI. Results from aggregative studies included in selected CPGs were obtained. Results Pharmacotherapy doubles smoking cessation rates as compared with placebos (rates @25% and up to 27 % when combined with counseling). The highest efficacy was observed for ansyolitic and antidepressive drugs (8.7 % to 19.4 %), and the lowest for nicotine replacement therapy -NRT- (5.2 % to 12.9 %). Nortriptiline shows an efficacy similar to that of bupropion (@10%). With limited exceptions, combined pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has shown no significant increase in cessation rates. Conclusions NRT, varenicline, bupropion and nortriptiline are effective treatments for smoking cessation. Combination of drugs deserves further clinical evidence and should be restricted to highly dependent smokers or initial therapeutic failure. Cost-effectiveness analyses might help to introduce smoking cessation programs in low and middle income countries.


Subject(s)
Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Smoking Cessation , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices , Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Bupropion/adverse effects , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Chest Pain/chemically induced , Clonidine/adverse effects , Clonidine/therapeutic use , Colombia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Administration Routes , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Mucositis/chemically induced , Nortriptyline/adverse effects , Nortriptyline/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/chemically induced , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/adverse effects , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Treatment Outcome , Varenicline/adverse effects , Varenicline/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL